# `pls_monitoring` — PLS monitoring (T² + Q with control limits) _Group_: **Diagnostic** · _Registry tolerance_: `1e-08` ## Description PLS process monitoring (T²/Q thresholds + alarms) (§19) > **Registry note** — R `mdatools::pls` reused for monitoring T². SIMPLS convention differences inflate the divergence; widened tolerance flags external-ref presence. ### Parameters | Name | Type | Default | Notes | |------|------|---------|-------| | `n_components` | `int` | `4` | registry benchmark cell value | | `alpha` | `float` | `0.05` | registry benchmark cell value | ## Explanations ### Bibliographic source Kourti, T. & MacGregor, J. F. (1996). *Multivariate SPC methods for process and product monitoring and control*. Journal of Quality Technology 28(4), 409–428. ### Mathematical principle Combine T² and Q with parametric control limits to obtain a 2-D monitoring chart for online process control. Samples are classified as in-control if both statistics fall below their respective limits; otherwise an alarm is raised. The two statistics are statistically nearly independent (T² lives in the latent space, Q in its orthogonal complement), so joint alarms reflect compound failures. pls4all's monitoring routine returns, for each sample, the T² and Q values, their control-limit ratios, and a boolean alarm flag. Limits are derived from the calibration distribution: F-quantile for T², Jackson–Mudholkar normal approximation for Q. Used as the back-end of a process SPC dashboard or as a test-set sanity check before deploying a PLS model in production. ### Implementation `n4m_metrics_pls_monitoring_run` — returns a dict with alarm vectors. R roxygen note (`diagnostics.R::pls_monitoring`): > PLS process monitoring (Hotelling T² + Q with alarms). ### Usage Every pls4all binding tab dispatches into the same C kernel; the external libraries listed at the bottom of the page are the parity references registered in `benchmarks.parity_timing.registry`. Switch tabs to read the same fit in your language. The R package now ships drop-in-compatible facades for the CRAN `pls` package (`plsr`, `pcr`, `mvr`) and for the `mdatools::pls(x, y, ...)` matrix idiom — those tabs appear only on the methods that have a meaningful equivalence. **pls4all bindings** ::::{tab-set} :class: pls4all-bindings :::{tab-item} C ABI · libn4m :sync: c :class-label: lang-c ```c /* C ABI — libn4m */ n4m_context_t* ctx = n4m_context_create(); n4m_config_t* cfg = n4m_config_create(); n4m_method_result_t* res = NULL; n4m_metrics_pls_monitoring_run(ctx, cfg, &x_view, &y_view, /* hyperparams */, &res); /* … read coefficients / mask / scores via */ /* n4m_method_result_get_double_matrix / vector / scalar … */ n4m_method_result_destroy(res); n4m_config_destroy(cfg); n4m_context_destroy(ctx); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all (raw) :sync: python-raw :class-label: lang-python ```python import pls4all from pls4all._methods import pls_monitoring_run with pls4all.Context() as ctx, pls4all.Config() as cfg: res = pls_monitoring_run(ctx, cfg, X, y, n_components=4) # then: res.matrix("predictions"), res.matrix("coefficients"), # res.vector("mask"), res.scalar("intercept"), … ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all.sklearn :sync: python-sklearn :class-label: lang-python ```python from pls4all.sklearn import pls_monitoring result = pls_monitoring(X, y, n_components=4) ``` ::: :::{tab-item} R · pls4all_method() :sync: r-dispatcher :class-label: lang-r ```r library(pls4all) # Unified low-level dispatcher (May 2026 R cleanup): res <- pls4all_method("pls_monitoring", X, y, n_components = 4L, params = list(alpha = 0.05)) # res is a named list with MethodResult arrays/scalars. # selected_indices / top_k_intervals are 1-based. ``` ::: :::{tab-item} R · pls4all (raw fn) :sync: r-raw :class-label: lang-r ```r library(pls4all) res <- pls_monitoring(model, X_reference, X_monitor, alpha = 0.95) yhat <- pls4all_predict(res, X_test) ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (MEX) :sync: matlab-mex :class-label: lang-matlab ```matlab res = pls4all.fit("pls_monitoring", X, y, "NumComponents", 4); yhat = predict(res, Xtest); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (classdef) :sync: matlab-classdef :class-label: lang-matlab _No idiomatic classdef wrapper — invoke `pls4all.fit("pls_monitoring", X, y, …)` directly from the unified MEX factory._ ::: :::: **Registry parity references** 📐 :::{card} :class-card: external-refs - 📐 **`ref.r_mdatools`** (R · r) — `mdatools` 0.15.0 · strict (rmse_rel ≤ 1e-08) — R `mdatools::pls` returning T² for monitoring rows. SIMPLS-convention differences with pls4all inflate divergence; qualitative parity. ::: ### Benchmarks Adaptive wall-clock per cell measured against [`full_matrix.csv`](../benchmarks/overview.md). Only backends that implement this method are listed; libraries without the method are omitted. **Verdict**  ·  ✓ ref / ≈ ref / ~ shape mark a reference-gate pass at strict / relaxed / qualitative tolerance  ·  ✓ bind = pls4all binding agrees with the C++ baseline  ·  ⇄ cross-check = documented by-design selector/RNG/model, noncanonical API/facade convention, or secondary oracle  ·  ✗ divergent  ·  ⚠ error  ·  — not run. The fastest backend per column is marked 🏆. **Reference gate**: strict — numeric equivalence (`rmse_rel_tol ≤ 1e-08`). Rows tagged with **📐** are the canonical parity references for this method (declared in [`parity_timing.registry`](../benchmarks/methodology.md)). C++ and external rows show reference parity; pls4all language bindings show binding parity against the C++ backend. Hover the icon for role and tolerance band. ::::{tab-set} :class: parity-tabs :::{tab-item} 1 thread :sync: threads-1
BackendParity200×30 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref 5e-151.23 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind1.18 ms🏆
pls4all.sklearn✓ bind1.32 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✓ 1e-132.90 ms
pls4all.R.formula✓ 1e-133.54 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✓ 1e-133.81 ms
pls4all.R.pls✓ 1e-133.74 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_mdatoolssource14.2 ms
::: :::{tab-item} 3 threads :sync: threads-3
BackendParity200×30 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref 5e-151.19 ms🏆
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind2.29 ms
pls4all.sklearn✓ bind1.41 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✓ 1e-133.19 ms
pls4all.R.formula✓ 1e-134.18 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✓ 1e-134.00 ms
pls4all.R.pls✓ 1e-134.17 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_mdatoolssource14.3 ms
::: :::{tab-item} 10 threads :sync: threads-10
BackendParity200×30 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref 5e-151.26 ms🏆
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind1.61 ms
pls4all.sklearn✓ bind1.34 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✓ 1e-135.85 ms
pls4all.R.formula✓ 1e-139.79 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✓ 1e-137.99 ms
pls4all.R.pls✓ 1e-133.84 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_mdatoolssource14.4 ms
::: :::: --- _See also_: [benchmark overview](../benchmarks/overview.md) · [methods index](index.md) · [interactive dashboard](../landing/dashboard.md)